Terrorisms becoming or no?

The evolution of terrorism
What are some of the concepts in what the authors call a ‘deeper level of understanding’People are reactive to what things occur to them. Be things are working out, whether they deserve the more or less. Things aren’t but effecting goes in politics and they exaggerate anarchy and activists to insult and catergorize them at attack levels while seek protecting them while they are called the terror they aren’t. So redefining and offenses in evolution are going to occur. People want better in politics.

 

The events in peoples life drastically effected because of terrorism but they don’t think procedures, organizations or over exaggerations are the thing. The children and pre – teens of 9.11 not aware of prior flight procedures just should think lines are regularly that long. And the other anonymous are just that way. Always been the things they define the reaction to that define in reaction to different always and one isn’t terrorism. Sympathies influencing definitions of terrorism definitions. Is the word sympathy or mourning. Mourning could attack what people think of a terrorist claiming to care in my name, say.
by rosette jones

globalization transparency comment

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
The claims of transparency isn’t the word transparency assault. Ethics politics. In academic business discipline ethics, discusses but then it is a different discipline . The historical governmental politic area. How do you fulfill the claims people state they are at me?
they say they are righteous. Then in non- assaults name – when possible it can be greed – they don’t do the harm, the money taken is fulfilled – explained and defended – they are greedy -well another topic another time. No. they are not inflictors of harm (be explained being harm is intentional.)
the problem is you take confuse it for money and submit to the kind of worst kind of criminal. – Transparency keeps saying – everythings all right. Not here is the assault in monies. That’s not transparency. Or let’s make sure there is no assault – and believe it. Organization structure isn’t designed for this. In most likely designed to cause or keep removal of good business ongoings from occurring.

Call it transparency. it’s not this money. Why seek this but from blocking harm. It isn’t what they are after. Non-profit earnings. A charitable organization, a non-profit organization operating with volunteers and somehow an increasing demand that the volunteers might seek compensation so they are asking for transparency? Ridiculous,. Oooh those good intention volunteers sneaking and going all out this time, they are going to take, more than one thousand dollars this week. Instead of last week you know, that was one million dollars but now they have these transparency comments.

Rosette Antoinette Zacie J

If 10 million goes missing in a non-[rofit organizaiton, why are they seeking to invest a mainly voluntary non-profit organization like people wouldn’t seek some compensation. And defining this as transparency is academically wreckless. Transparency shouldn’t be just be anyone, but why anyone has access to others work operations of the way they conduct or report financials. There are reasons, but here. In a world where 130 million isn’t change missing to some organizations in this operating aspect of money going into a non-profits….but react like? This organization operates and communicates with international governments all over. 10 million dollars. Transparency is why aren’t they paying a mainly volunteer staff when they can state over a million dollars missing till function in this CPI price index.

but up to 8-9 million dollars pricing indexes. The initiave has it’s priorities out of wack.

– comment academic on globalization at Georgetown

also published at

http://rosetteismyname.blogspot.com/

RosetteIsMyName.wordpress.com